For 1.1 and 1.2 metadata where data_offset is not zero,
it is important to align the data_offset to underlying
block size.
We don't currently have access to the particular device
in avail_size so just try to force to a 1Meg boundary.
Also default 1.x metadata to 1.2 as documented.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Change default - again, sorry.
v1.1 causes problems as the conflicts with a boot sector, whether on
the whole device or in a partition. I guess the rule is they you
aren't allowed to use the first sector in general.
v1.2 is mostly just as good and avoid boot-sector problems so default
to that instead.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Some devices have 4K sector sizes. So try to align the bitmap
on a 4K boundary.
This isn't possible when hot-adding a bitmap, but will be once
we add support for configuring the bitmap via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
1.x metadata allows a device to be a member of the array while it
is still recoverying. So it is a working member, but is not
completely in-sync.
mdadm/assemble does not understand this distinction and assumes that a
work member is fully in-sync for the purpose of determining if there
are enough in-sync devices for the array to be functional.
So collect the 'recovery_start' value from the metadata and use it in
assemble when determining how useful a given device is.
Reported-by: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Replace occurrences of ~0ULL to make it clear we are talking about maximal
resync/recovery position.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
- When --kill-superblock is used with --metadata, find every
different superblock if there are several and kill them all.
- When creating a new array, kill off any old metadata. The code
to do this was already present but has become broken over time.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
->validate_geometry is called to validate overall parameters,
and to validate each individual device.
If it ever fails, it needs to report the reason, as common code
cannot possible know.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
A small bitmap-chunksize hurts performance without helping
resync speed much - particularly on internal bitmaps.
So set the default to at least 64Meg.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
1.1 is more flexible in a number of ways and is safer.
0.90 is still fully supported.
1.0 should possibly be used for RAID1 arrays that you
want to boot off, depending on your boot loader.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Previously such things did not exist: ACTIVE and SYNC were either both
set or both clear. Recent changes with reshape means that a device
can be ACTIVE but not yet fully in-sync, so they need to be handled
and included in the array as active devices.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Because ---examine --brief, or --detail --brief are
often used to create mdadm.conf, and because people don't want to
have to update their mdadm.conf unnecessarily, we don't want to
include information that might change.
And now that level changing is supported, that is almost everything
but UUID.
So move some more fields into the "Only print with --verbose" class.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The line 'auto' in mdadm.conf can be used to disable assembly
of specific metadata types, or of all arrays.
This does not affect assembly of arrays listed in mdadm.conf
or on command line.
auto -all
will disable all auto-assembly.
auto -ddf
will cause mdadm to ignore ddf arrays that are not explicitly
mentioned, and auto assemble anything else it finds.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Apparently the dereferencing of a type-punned pointer breaks strict
aliasing rules. And we wouldn't want to do that.
So just make a different array of the appropriate type and use memcpy.
Resolves-Debian-bug: 505375
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The information about how slots and roles in the array lined up
turned out to be confusing.
So simplify it and one provide the interesting information.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If the sector size is > 512, we need to be more careful about
alignment.
The largest known sector size is 4096 and (fortunately) both the
superblock and (in many cases) the bitmap are 4096-byte aligned.
So there should be no data-overlap problems.
The exception is when the bitmap is squeezed into the 3K after the
superblock. This arrangement cannot currently be supported on
4K sector-size devices.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
There was a few kernel releases where the kernel would shrink max_dev
to be just enough to hold the current number of devices.
More recent kernels never shrink it.
However to be as compatible as possible, if we notice that
max_dev is too small to successfully add a device, increase it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Metadata formats like imsm work in concert with platform firmware and
hardware, so provide a way for mdadm to display this info to the user.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Certain operations (Detail.c mainly) would print out the metadata of
an array in a format that the scan operation in super0.c and super1.c
would later reject as unknown when it was found in the mdadm.conf file.
Use a consistent format, but also modify the super0 and super1 match
methods to accept the other format without complaint.
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Made the mistake of recompiling the F9 mdadm rpm which has a patch to
remove -Werror and add "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE -O2" which turns on lots
of errors:
config.c:568: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
Assemble.c:411: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
Assemble.c:413: warning: ignoring return value of asprintf
super0.c:549: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super0.c:742: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super0.c:812: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:692: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:1039: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super1.c:1155: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:508: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:645: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:696: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:715: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1476: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1603: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1614: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:1842: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2013: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2140: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2143: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2147: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2150: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2162: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2169: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2172: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2176: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2181: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:2686: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:2690: warning: ignoring return value of write
super-ddf.c:3070: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
super-ddf.c:3254: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
bitmap.c:128: warning: ignoring return value of posix_memalign
mdmon.c:94: warning: ignoring return value of write
mdmon.c:221: warning: ignoring return value of pipe
mdmon.c:327: warning: ignoring return value of write
mdmon.c:330: warning: ignoring return value of chdir
mdmon.c:335: warning: ignoring return value of dup
monitor.c:415: warning: rv may be used uninitialized in this function
...some of these like the write() ones are not so trivial so save those
fixes for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
If we add a device to a linear array which is a difference size
to the other devices in the array then, for v1.x metadata, we need to
make sure the size is correctly reflected in the superblock.
Showing e.g.
near=1, far=2
for the 'far2' layout of raid10 is confusing even though there is a
sense in which is it correct.
Make it less confusing by only printing whichever number is not 1.
If both are 1, make that clear too (i.e. no redundancy).
When adding a device to an array, we check that it is large enough.
Currently the check makes sure there is also room for a reasonably
sized bitmap. But if the array doesn't have a bitmap, then this test
might be too restrictive.
So when adding, only insist there is enough space for the current
bitmap.
When Creating, still require room for the standard sized bitmap.
This resolved Debian Bug 500309
Using buffered IO risks non-atomic updates to parts of the
device that we don't actually want to write to. This isn't in
general safe.
So switch to O_DIRECT for all that IO and make sure we have
properly aligned buffers.
When loading the metadata for a subarray (super_by_fd), we set
->subarray to be the name read from md/metadata_version so that
getinfo_super can return info about the correct array.
With this we can differentiate between a container and
an array within the container by looking at ->subarray[0].
Using write_init_super to add a spare to an active array is quite
different to how it is used when creating an array.
It mostly works, but if we are adding two devices to an array,
then when we add the second, there are still traces of the first
which confuse write_init_super.
So get write_init_super to ignore those traces. Longer term, we
probably want to do this differently as for DDF, hot-adding to
an active array will have to be quite different - it will want to
write to all metadata, possibly via mdmon.
The current model for creating arrays involves writing
a superblock to each device in the array.
With containers (as with DDF), that model doesn't work.
Every device in the container may need to be updated
for an array made from just some the devices in a container.
So instead of calling write_init_super for each device,
we call it once for the array and have it iterate over
all the devices in the array.
To help with this, ->add_to_super now passes in an 'fd' and name for
the device. These get saved for use by write_init_super. So
add_to_super takes ownership of the fd, and write_init_super will
close it.
This information is stored in the new 'info' field of supertype.
As part of this, write_init_super now removes any old traces of raid
metadata rather than doing this in common code.