Check on upper limit of number of devices was in the wrong place.
Result was could not create array with more than 27 devices without
explicitly setting metadata, even though default metadata allows more.
Fixed, and also perform check when growing an array.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
I'm seen mdadm spinning while failing to read 'degraded'.
This doesn't really fix it, but is a reminder that it needs to be
fixed.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If we can't read actual disk state, it shoud be initiated
to 0.
Overwise it may be out of date value resulting false action
later in code (e.g. set disk to improper state).
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Due to a miscalculation we didn't initialise the whole file.
There is 4K (8 sectors) for the metadata, then the data.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Before resizing an array with --size or --array-size, then filesystem
should be resized. mdadm cannot do this so the user should.
Reported-by: Gavin Flower <gavinflower@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When opening an array to manipulate it we never need to write to the
array and sometimes it might be read-only so the open for write will
fail.
So always open read-only.
Reported-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When an array using native metadata is increasing in size, we don't
need to keep monitoring it after the initial 'critical section'.
So detect that case.
If a final level-change is still needed mdadm will wait for that,
otherwise it will simply exit.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We now test ->reshape_active, but don't set it in a common case.
So just zero out the whole structure to be on the safe side.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This is done via conversion to RAID4 and back.
To grow the array, extra devices will be needed which cannot
already be present as spares - so allow a list of new devices
to be included in grow request which changed the number of devices.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When an RAID0 is started using SET_ARRAY_INFO ioctl the
component_size will be zero.
This confused the code for reshaping a RAID0 via RAID4.
So if that seems to be the case, fake a believable component_size
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
mdadm has a convention in some areas of passing a device name
if error messages about it are interesting, or NULL if not.
Follow this convention with find_intel_hba_capability so that it
doesn't complain when not appropriate - and so that it doesn't
have to go and find a device name that it wasn't given.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
OROM/EFI capabilities are retrieved based on disk's controller type.
1/ alloc_super no longer retrieves OROM capabilities
2/ find_imsm_capability replaces find_imsm_orom
3/ new function find_intel_hba_capability gets disk's HBA and relevant
capability
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Function find_intel_hba_capability attaches HBA information
to intel_super structure based on fd of the component disk.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
compare_super_imsm verifies that the component disks use the same type of HBA
in platform dependent environment. Otherwise print-out error message and block
the action.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Arrays exceeding the OROM/EFI maximum number of supported disk are
blocked in validate_geometry_imsm_orom function.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Print-out error message when volume geometry fails to comply with
OROM/EFI controller's capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Container_content_imsm calls validate_goemtry_imsm_orom to verify that
the array parameters are supported by controller's OROM/EFI.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The function uses find_intel_device and find_imsm_capability to present
AHCI and SAS controller capabilities taken from OROM or EFI.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If operating system is installed using efi, IMSM platform capabilities are
not available via option ROM, but are stored as efi variables. New
mechanism has been introduced to obtain capabilities by variables.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
It will be used for reading efi variables with capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The structure is update according to current specification. These values
are not used right now, but they are not "reserved" anymore.
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Czarnowski <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Adds data offset to PCI expansion ROM Data Structure in resource
describing Expansion ROMs. This allows AHCI OROM scanning function
to identify AHCI OROM by device id 0x2822 and vendor id 0x8086.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
During reshape for dirty volumes reshape_progress has to be calculated
also. To keep the same logic for array creation:
not setting info->resync_start = MaxSector when first condition is
true,
resync_start is initialized by MaxSector to allow proper array
initialization.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
For not reshaped array in container during assembly array is in
auto-read-only state. It is not possible to set disk slot for such
array and later reshape cannot be started also. To move array from
'auto-read-only' to 'active' state storing 'active' state to sysfs is
added. This allows for disks configuration and reshape.
During reshaped array restart it is disabled by condition on restart
variable.
When reshape is starting, storing 'active' state to already active
array should not matter.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When opening an array to manipulate it we never need to write to the
array and sometimes it might be read-only so the open for write will
fail.
So always open read-only.
Reported-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
when starting an array that is in the middle of a migration,
we need to start mdmon, just as we do for arrays which are not
in the middle of a migration.
Repored-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Currently whole array geometry is set in sysfs_set_array(),
so none of disks (even for expansion) should fail during sysfs_add_disk()
Due to this expansion counter should be used for reshaped array when
disk slot is bigger than number of disks in array.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When array under reshape is assembled it has to be disabled from
monitoring as soon as possible. It can occur that this is i.e second
array in container and mdmon is loaded already.
Lack of blocking monitoring can cause change array state to active,
and reshape continuation will be not possible.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
st->sb is null. This is exception cause.
reshape_container() function expects that super block will be loaded.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This is a bit of a hack - probably analyse change needs to be
re-written a bit to handle this properly.
However when the metadata deduced the intermediate state for a
reshaping array, the 'new_level' it sets should not be used to
interpret the 'delta_disks' number.
So in that case, hide the new_level while calling analyse_change.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The 'raid_disks' for a container is zero, so subtracting it
from the given raid_disks to get delta_disks doesn't make sense.
Rather set delta_disks to UnSet and set raid_disks to the requested
number of disks. This then gets passed to reshape_super() which
can use it as required.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The check that the array info is already in 'native format' is
only relevant when restarting a growth, so only perform it then.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Normally when reshape_array is called with restart == 0,
info->array is the same as the 'array' read from the kernel
(via ioctl) so both have the same level.
However when called from reshape_container, info->array was
generated by the metadata so it will have 'level' set to the
intermediate (or final) level already.
So to test if we need to change the level, we need to compare the
desired level with that which was loaded from the kernel (array.level)
rather than that which was read from metadata (info->array.level).
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The check for 'enough spares' doesn't apply to RAID0 as we don't
mind it going degraded. But add a test that there are enough spares
to actually produce a working array.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
the new code for defaulting chunksizes didn't work quite right
- default was set to late in super1/super0/ddf
- defaults would over-ride values of '0' imposed by some levels
- default value wasn't applied to size properly.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Array state has to be managed during reshape based on consistent flag.
To achieve this existing code will be reused. Currently existing code for
blocks_per_unit calculation can be removed
and existing code can be reused also.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Some grow operations must be applied to a whole container. These
are performed one array at a time, so only one array appears to
be reshaping.
When re-assembling such an array, we need to make sure that
when the reshape finished, we move on to the next array.
So require metadata to set ->reshape_active = 2 in that case,
and use reshape_container to complete the reshape.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Variables declaration moved a little bit up,
to not mix declaration and code.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>