When analyse_change sets level=1, data_disks is meaningless
as is layout.
So don't set them, and make sure we ignore them.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Add support for raid1 to raid0 takeover operation in user space.
This patch includes support for native and imsm metadata.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
During reshape when reshape is finished in md, progress_reshape() hangs
on select().
This is because 'sync_completed' is reset to zero before 'sync_action'
becomes 'idle', and we don't look for notification on 'sync_action'.
So if completed becomes zero after reshape_progress has made some
progress, then deduce that reshape has finished.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
when in container are present raid0 and raid5 arrays, and reshape order is:
1. raid0 array
2. raid5 array
mdadm cannot set new raid_disks for raid0 array. For this action md has to have
handshake with mdmon. We have the following conditions:
1. Raid0 is not monitored
2. raid0 has been just takeovered to raid4/5 (it has to be monitored
3. monitor has to start monitor new raid4/5 array
4. monitor is not started (it is started to second raid5 array)
In such situation pig_monitor is required to let know to m monitor about new array
(not in the starting monitor case only)
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The patch introduces takeover from level 10 to level 0 for imsm
metadata. This patch contains procedures connected with preparing
and applying metadata update during 10 -> 0 takeover.
When performing takeover 10->0 mdmon should update the external
metadata (due to disk slot and level changes).
To achieve that mdadm calls reshape_super() and prepare
the "update_takeover" metadata update type.
Prepared update is processed by mdmon in process_update().
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
- when reshaping a container, ->reshape_active is already set
even though it isn't really active yet, so we need to set
the new geometry even when reshape_active is set. This is safe.
- When restarting a reshape, make sure the reshape_position is set
appropriately when external metadata is used.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Only adjust reshape_progress based on the backup that was found
if the backup covered the current reshape_progress point.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping backwards we only backup from backup_blocks to
the start, so initialise backup_point appropriately.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
I'm seen mdadm spinning while failing to read 'degraded'.
This doesn't really fix it, but is a reminder that it needs to be
fixed.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping from the end of the array to the start, for times
when the number of data devices is decreasing, the handling of the
backup area isn't a simple mirror of the handling on low-to-hi
reshapes as the backup areas is always low in the array.
So re-write that to make it work.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When reshaping it is correct to open containers exclusively, but not
arrays. The array could very easily be in use, e.g. by a mounted
filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
For non re-striping transitions array must be unfrozen
before end of processing.
For restriping transitions we normally let the child
unfreeze the array but in this case there is no child.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
reshape.after.data_disks field must be initiated
for raid0<->raid10 transition.
Instead calculated spares_needed variable in reshape_array
function has random value.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wojcik <krzysztof.wojcik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When mdadm falls in "reduce size" error on takeovered array it jumps
to release and tries execute backward takeover. This time sra pointer
is not initialized and coredump is generated.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we restart an array in the middle of a reshape, we reuse a lot of
the code for starting the reshape, but it needs to know that
circumstances are slightly different.
So add a 'restart' arg which is used:
- skip checking and adding spares
- activate the array (rather than start reshape)
- allow the backup file to already exist
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When restarting an array that is in the middle of a reshape,
sync_min cannot be set. So just ignore any errors we get
when trying to set it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Particular problem was that we didn't unfreeze if a reshape
wasn't needed.
But all that 'rv' stuff isn't needed and some of it was wrong,
so simplify it all.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We only 'goto release' on error, but that branch contained handling
for non-error conditions: reloading metadata. Obviously that doesn't
work.
So re-arrange the code to make it more of a straight line that is
easier to follow and reload the metadata if that might be at all
needed.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Everything other than the 'child' part of the 'switch(fork)' returns
quickly, so leave them inside the switch but move the other large bit
out so as to make the flow of code more natural.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
1/ don't pass 'frozen' as an arg to unfreeze - just use it
to conditionally call 'unfreeze'.
2/ Always unfreeze at end of reshape_container
3/ Only unfreeze at end of reshape_array if not 'forked'. So when
reshape_array is called from reshape_container it doesn't unfreeze,
but when called directly.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When container is passed to grow_reshape(), load_container() function
has to be used to get all required information from metadata.
So load_super is never correct here - in particular, cfd is a
'container fd' so we must 'load_container' on it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
reshape_super() called from reshape_container() with size set to
info->component_size gives size in reshape_super == -2 due to unsigned
signed conversion (info->component_size is not initializes).
As size is not changed during container reshape '-1' value is passed
to indicate this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
reshape_array uses text_version to reload the container content,
so make sure it is available.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Add disks fails due to empty sys name field.
sysfs_init fills out required fields for add disk operation.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To reshape a RAID0 we convert to RAID4 first. This makes it look
like it could be degraded and so we are tempted to ensure there are
enough spares. However this is not appropriate for RAID0, so
explicitly exclude new_level == RAID0 in this check
Reported-by: Adam Kwolek <adam.kwolek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Child_monitor was design to perform 'manage_reshape' for native
arrays. So change the signature for ->manage_reshape to match
child_monitor and move the all to the same place that child_monitor
is called from.
Also give super-intel a manage_reshape handler which simple calls
child_monitor.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
child_monitor has overall responsibility for backups using the generic
bsb, so move all handling under it's control.
signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
We currently suspend rather large sections of
the array which can take a while to process.
Possibly smaller sections are better. Possibly it should be
adjusted on a timeout basis.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The array might not be a multiple of the chosen backup size, so
the last bit to be backed up might be a bit smaller. Handle that
correctly.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
At some points we need to perform 2 backups at once so as to
start the 'double buffering' approach. So rather than assuming
what the next backup should be, example suspend_point and backup
as much as possible up to there.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
1/ We need to clean up the backup file after the reshape finishes.
2/ We need to remove the suspended region and clear the resync
controls after the resync finishes.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The array_size we need to consider is the largest possible size of the
array, which is a different calculation depending on whether the array
is growing or shrinking.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
'sync_completed' can sometimes have a value which is slightly high.
So round-down relevant values to new-chunk size and that is what we
want.
Subtract from component_size after scaling down rather than before as
that is easier.
Make sure max_progress never goes negative when reshaping backwards.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The current code is right.
Instead compute where we might eventually need to back up to, and
then compare that to how far we have progressed.
Also move suspend_point up towards where we might need to backup to,
rather than just as far as max_progress - as max_progress can never
exceed where we are currently suspended to.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
It isn't needed as we always work in multiples of full
destination stripes.
Also multiply by 'after' disks, not before.
We can progress until the point we would write then lines up with
where we would read now.
We read now from
array-address: reshape_progress device-address: read_offset
So we write then to
device-address: read_offset array-address: read_offset * after.disks
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The 'blocks' number computed by analyse_change is the number of
blocks that it makes sense to back-up at a time.
It is the smallest number of blocks that is a whole number of
stripes in both the old and the new layout.
However we are also using it as the smallest amount of progress
that can be made at a time, which is wrong as it is always valid
to progress a single stripe in the new layout.
So change 'blocks' to be called 'backup_blocks' to make it more clear.
And pass new_chunk size down so it can be used for 'minimum forward
progress' calculations.
Also set 'stripes' (the amount actually backed up) from the
possibly-scaled 'blocks' number rather than ignoring it and using
backup_blocks.
Finally, get rid of 'read_range' as it isn't used (or needed).
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Once we have called reshape_container or reshape_super we have handed
on the responsibility for unfreezing the array, so Grow_reshape
shouldn't call unfreeze.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When converting to RAID6, the new layout should match the old
layout, not the RAID6 version of the old layout.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
NeilBrown
Krzysztof Wojcik
Adam Kwolek
Marcin Labun