This is a series of tests checking if mdadm Monitor migrates spares
according to rules in /etc/mdadm.conf defined by POLICY lines.
Signed-off-by: Anna Czarnowska <anna.czarnowska@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcin Labun <marcin.labun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Default metadata type is now 1.2, and we sometimes
add extra alignment before the data section,
so adjust tests for these changes.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
1.1 is more flexible in a number of ways and is safer.
0.90 is still fully supported.
1.0 should possibly be used for RAID1 arrays that you
want to boot off, depending on your boot loader.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The 'udevadm settle' call appears to resolve:
mdadm: failed to stop array /dev/md127: Device or resource busy
Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
As we open and close so quickly, udev might still have the device
open. so call udevsettle before stopping an array during testing.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The variety of approaches to 'add_disk' are factored out into
a separate function, and Incremental mode benefits by being
closer to supporting the assembly of containers.
Also remove the adding-to-array-data-structure out of sysfs_add_disk
and into add_disk.
And add some tests for --incremental mode to make sure we don't break it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If you have stacked arrays, then
mdadm -As --homehost=fred
should work but doesn't. It gets into an infinite loop!
So write some tests, and fix the bugs.
As spared don't have a position in the raid array with verion-1 superblocks,
we need to handle them a bit differently.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Support "--build"ing arrays with bitmaps.
hot-removal of bitmaps
--re-add of drives recently removed.
assorted extra tests
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>